Enough already!
When the Senate passed their Christmas Eve health insurance bill I went ballistic. This was the last straw. The Senate had passed a bill which funded their health insurance disaster by taxing so called "Cadillac Plans": "Cadillac Plan" is of course is a euphemism for union bargained health insurance. "Rich Off the Hook, Workers pay for all!" What a deal. Thanks Harry, thanks Nancy, thanks Barack. Next time voting for leadership comes up, I'll buy a pack of razor blades instead.
Personally, I must have negotiated around 100 labor contracts between the early 1980s to 2003. This is no exaggeration; there was not one of these contracts where health insurance was not a major issue if not the major issue. Workers were universally clear across the board and across time. Health insurance was key. The objective was maintenance of health insurance and good health care for workers and their families no matter what the cost. In an era of eroded labor militancy, health care was the one issue which could lead to a strike.
After 25 years and a million of these tough fights it can easily be argued that unionized workers are the only people outside of the wealthy who have adequate health care. And this could all come to the end with the stroke of a pen; the pen of of Harry Reid, Jim Baucus, a rogues gallery of elected chumps, Barack Obama... The whole lot of em'.
So, workers making $12, $15, $20 per hour are now looking at 40% taxes... nine, ten thousand dollars in taxes per year if they dare continue to fight for good health care. This is the Democrats' recipe for meaningful health care reform?
Don't blame this on the Republicans. Here, the Democrats are 100% responsible for their own shame. Here, the Democrats have made a clear choice by passing a bill which fails in just about every respect as far as solving real national health care, that represents a burden rather than a hope for millions who have had nothing. And then, the final walk on the backs of union workers... And for what? So Obama and the Democrats can have a "legislative victory"? A victory which looks to dismantle decent health care in the one area where it does exist? A victory which will offer the rest of us private market limited catastrophic coverages for exorbitant premiums, or fines? A victory which leaves intact and healthy the kind of practices which lead to 17% premium hikes per year? A victory which knowingly sacrifices the nations' over all health in the interests of a profitably solvent health insurance and health provider industry?
You can take this victory and shove it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)




5 comments:
I have to agree. If workers get clobbered by the so-called reforms, then not only is that a disaster by itself, but Democrats will pay for it at the polls as well. One would think that the political ramifications of taxing workers' health plans, initiating a mandate to purchase without meaningful cost controls, and putting the insurance exchanges under the control of the insurance industry would make Obama and the Democrats think twice.
Exactly right. In addition this is a message to employers to fight Union everything as they have the backing of both political parties.
Like when Reagan fired PATCO (Air Traffic Controllers). That was a message to all employers- The Democrats and even the AFL-CIO had a tepid response. That is the message
Workers won't get clobbered if we fight back. It was--it is--encouraging to see some trade union leaders pushing back on the administration lately. They would not be doing this were it not for tremendous rank and file dissatisfaction. I don't think that this dissatisfaction is mass dissatisfaction with the Obama administration, which contains many people sympathetic to labor's best goals, but with the capitalist crisis overall, or to the symptoms of that crisis. We need to be all about helping people clarify exactly what's wrong and being the force for action on those issues. If we are not doing this, the right picks up those people, moves the center further right and/or those people sit out social confrontations. There is plenty of blame to go around on healthcare and I'm not going to dump it all at the doors of the administration or the Democrats. The monopolies worked successfully against the people; we need more emphasis on this guiding reality. The fight will logically shift to the details of the bills and then to moving from whatever shattered form of universal coverage we have to national healthcare once more. If we take the position that we have lost and surrender the field our defeatism will go hand-in-glove with the Blue Dog Democrats program. Assigning all blame to the Democrats and the administration is defeatist, I think.
there was a mandate given in 2006 and 2008; a complete repudiation of right-wing policy. and yet, the right still controls the debate. this garbage version of health "insurance" reform isn't even center-left. it's corporate pocket lining, just like the bailout.
we all knew we were voting in center-left folks nationally and here in the valley. but i agree with strannik, the Dems are going to take it in the shorts in 2010. and it will then be marketed as a repudiation of left-wing policy, when in reality the right hates all that's going on because they do what they are told, and the left hates what's going on because it's wrong. the center gets annoyed and forgets why they voted the minority party out in the first place, and soon enough Tom Delay-type activities are occurring again in Congress.
i refuse to make excuses for the Democratic leadership. i refuse to give them slack. the American people voted for backbone for "Main St.", and for three years haven gotten hardly anything. this health insurance reform WILL backfire. it is the exact wrong approach at the exact wrong time. the Democrats have a complete misreading of what this time in history calls for.
they are the lesser of two evils currently, but all the hard work of actual progressive Democrats is going to be lost if the leadership of the party drives it into the ditch.
I don't think that the right completely or still controls the debate; I still think that's up for grabs and if we don't organize now the next elections and whatever momentum we have will be lost. I'm also not sure if there was the mandate we thought there was at the time; we certainly over-estimated the strength and resilience of core forces and saw a movement where only a weaker, but important, push existed. I'd rather make those errors than err on the side of isolation, but an error is an error. And we're learning from it and we have some new opportunities. Moreover, the right-wing has also split, and continues to do so, and lacks almost any coherence. The circus they put on with the tea bag interventions is just that exactly.
There will be some exciting opportunities in 2010 to keep building, and a balance could shift in at least 5 key states for the Dems if people at the grassroots get it right. Progressive Dems will have a difficult time walking the line between the administration, the Blue Dogs, the Republicans and whatever progressive principles they have--but there are serious contradictions in each of those camps and a groundswell behind them could push people in the administration to the left. I'm hoping that something new arises with the comiong elections and I think that's possible.
Post a Comment